gaqquote.blogg.se

Lightroom vs dxo photolab 4
Lightroom vs dxo photolab 4












lightroom vs dxo photolab 4 lightroom vs dxo photolab 4

Point 2 might not be quite true, macros and whatnot might of been possible, but really that's too much effort for event work every time.

lightroom vs dxo photolab 4

Great combination, IMHO Tried Affinity earlier in the year, and returned/refunded (within the 30 day trial) ġ) brush work was slower than in LR/PS for some reason on my PC.Ģ) No catalogue syncing ability (cannot edit one image and apply those changes quickly across a bunch of images). Lutify doesn't support C1 layers, but I can use layers in Photo to apply Lutify LUTs selectively, if needed. I bought the Lutify LUT package that are compatible with C1 but also with any editor that supports LUTs (as Affinity Photo), so I can choose to apply a style in Photo or in C1. * If later I want to continue editing the original TIFF, I choose 'Open with' from C1, the TIFF is opened in Photo and everything I created previously with Photo is there. * On C1 I see the edited and flattened TIFF, and I can add more editing if I want, for example some film style or so. * Save the TIFF and choose 'export with layers', this way all the layers, setting, etc, I made with Photo are preserved. * When I want to finish a pic, choose 'Edit with' from C1, select Photo and use TIFF as the export format (plus color space, 8/16 bit, etc.). I use C1 with Photo similar as you use LR + PS, and it integrates quite good in this way: I have Photo, Designer and Publisher, all the pack. It's so good that I usually follow PS tutorials with it. Affinity Photo is a really good piece of editing software.














Lightroom vs dxo photolab 4